Lake City Development Corp. v. Gilbert Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Lake City Development Corp. v. Gilbert Construction Co.

320 S.E.2d 494, 283 S.C. 10, 1984 S.C. App. LEXIS 548

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina

DecidedSeptember 13, 1984

Docket0262

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 320 S.E.2d 494 (Lake City Development Corp. v. Gilbert Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lake City Development Corp. v. Gilbert Construction Co., 320 S.E.2d 494, 283 S.C. 10, 1984 S.C. App. LEXIS 548 (S.C. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Shaw, Judge:

This appeal is from an order of the lower court allowing the respondent, Gilbert Construction Company, to join the Town of Lake City, James Law, Yarn Industries, C. B. Askins & Company, Inc., and I & T Mechanical Engineers, Inc. as third party defendants. We dismiss.

The order granted to respondent, Gilbert Construction Company, Ltd., the right within thirty days to serve an amended answer, counterclaim, cross-complaint and third party summons upon the Town of Lake City, Yarn Industries, Inc., James Law, C. B. Askins & Company, Inc. and I & T Mechanical Engineers, Inc.

The order of the lower court was not final at the time this appeal was taken and therefore is not appealable. Section 14-3-330 Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976, as amended. Goodson v. R. A. Taylor Construction Company, 266 S. C. 33, 221 S. E. (2d) 102 (1975).

Appellant’s appeal, being interlocutory is

Dismissed.

Bell and Goolsby, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI