Lajara v. Berger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lajara v. Berger

59 A.D.2d 599, 398 N.Y.S.2d 257, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13409

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 22, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 59 A.D.2d 599 (Lajara v. Berger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lajara v. Berger, 59 A.D.2d 599, 398 N.Y.S.2d 257, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13409 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered in this article 78 proceeding on September 9, 1976, dismissing the petition herein, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of limiting recoupment to 10% of petitioner’s household needs until $300 is paid and, as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The proportion of petitioner’s current grant that may be deducted for single recoupment purposes may not exceed 10% of her household needs, (Matter of Reyes v Dumpson, 40 NY2d 725) and respondent, State commissioner, so concedes. We have examined the other contentions raised by the [600]*600appellant hereon and find them to be without merit. Concur—Silverman, J. P., Evans, Capozzoli and Lynch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered in this article 78 proceeding on September 9, 1976, dismissing the petition herein, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of limiting recoupment to 10% of petitioner’s household needs until $300 is paid and, as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The proportion of petitioner’s current grant that may be deducted for single recoupment purposes may not exceed 10% of her household needs, (Matter of Reyes v Dumpson, 40 NY2d 725) and respondent, State commissioner, so concedes. We have examined the other contentions raised by the [600]*600appellant hereon and find them to be without merit. Concur—Silverman, J. P., Evans, Capozzoli and Lynch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A.D.2d 599, 398 N.Y.S.2d 257, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lajara-v-berger-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack