Laiso v. Cassetta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Laiso v. Cassetta

156 A.D.2d 544, 550 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15957

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 18, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 156 A.D.2d 544 (Laiso v. Cassetta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Laiso v. Cassetta, 156 A.D.2d 544, 550 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15957 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for intentional interference with precontractual relations with regard to the sale of a mobile home, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Stolarik, J.), entered April 29, 1988, which is in favor of the plaintiffs and against him in the principal sum of $29,138.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the trial court that the actions by the defendant constituted a malicious interference with the plaintiffs’ precontractual relations (see, Wasserman v NRG Realty Corp., 118 AD2d 495; Susskind v IPCO Hosp. Supply Corp., 49 AD2d 915; Restatement [Second] of Torts § 766B). Mollen, P. J., Rubin, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for intentional interference with precontractual relations with regard to the sale of a mobile home, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Stolarik, J.), entered April 29, 1988, which is in favor of the plaintiffs and against him in the principal sum of $29,138.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the trial court that the actions by the defendant constituted a malicious interference with the plaintiffs’ precontractual relations (see, Wasserman v NRG Realty Corp., 118 AD2d 495; Susskind v IPCO Hosp. Supply Corp., 49 AD2d 915; Restatement [Second] of Torts § 766B). Mollen, P. J., Rubin, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 A.D.2d 544, 550 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laiso-v-cassetta-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack