Laird v. Waterford

California Supreme Court

Laird v. Waterford

50 Cal. 315, 1875 Cal. LEXIS 156

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1875

DocketNo. 4628

StatusPublished

This text of 50 Cal. 315 (Laird v. Waterford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Laird v. Waterford, 50 Cal. 315, 1875 Cal. LEXIS 156 (Cal. 1875).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court:

The motion of defendants for a nonsuit ought to have been .granted. The plaintiffs failed to prove such a possession of the demanded premises as entitled them to maintain [317]*317the action, under the second subdivision of section 1160 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and there was no proof of a forcible entry or detainer.

Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded with an order to the court below to dismiss the action.

Bemittitur forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court:

The motion of defendants for a nonsuit ought to have been .granted. The plaintiffs failed to prove such a possession of the demanded premises as entitled them to maintain [317]*317the action, under the second subdivision of section 1160 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and there was no proof of a forcible entry or detainer.

Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded with an order to the court below to dismiss the action.

Bemittitur forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 Cal. 315, 1875 Cal. LEXIS 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laird-v-waterford-cal-1875.