Laird v. Stanwood United, Inc.

8 A.D.2d 789, 187 N.Y.S.2d 914, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8069

This text of 8 A.D.2d 789 (Laird v. Stanwood United, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laird v. Stanwood United, Inc., 8 A.D.2d 789, 187 N.Y.S.2d 914, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8069 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Opinion

Order setting aside verdict and conditionally directing new trial reversed, on the law and on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, and the verdict in favor of plaintiff reinstated, with costs to plaintiff-appellant-respondent. Since punitive damages were an element in the verdict awarded, the verdict is not excessive or unconscionable. On the question of liability there was a proper issue of fact for the jury which was submitted to it on a charge to which there was no exception. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 A.D.2d 789, 187 N.Y.S.2d 914, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8069, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laird-v-stanwood-united-inc-nyappdiv-1959.