Laird v. Snow

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 22, 2005
Docket04-1664
StatusUnpublished

This text of Laird v. Snow (Laird v. Snow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laird v. Snow, (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1664

JOHN LAIRD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN SNOW, Secretary, US Department of the Treasury,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (CA-03- 2717-RWT)

Submitted: February 9, 2005 Decided: February 22, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frederic M. Brandes, Timonium, Maryland, for Appellant. Thomas M. DiBiagio, United States Attorney, John W. Sippel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

John Laird appeals the district court’s orders denying

relief on his civil complaint and denying his motion for

reconsideration. We find that Laird’s complaint was untimely filed

for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we

affirm. See Laird v. Snow, No. CA-03-2717-RWT (D. Md. Mar. 17,

2004 & Apr. 15, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Laird v. Snow, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laird-v-snow-ca4-2005.