Laird v. Snow

Fourth Circuit

Laird v. Snow

121 F. App'x 541

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 22, 2005·No. No. 04-1664·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

John Laird appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his civil complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We find that Laird’s complaint was untimely filed for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See Laird v. Snow, No. CA-03-2717-RWT (D. Md. Mar. 17, 2004 & Apr. 15, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

John Laird appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his civil complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We find that Laird’s complaint was untimely filed for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See Laird v. Snow, No. CA-03-2717-RWT (D. Md. Mar. 17, 2004 & Apr. 15, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Laird v. Snow, 121 F. App'x 541 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

121 F. App'x 541 (Laird v. Snow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.