Laird v. Snow
This text of Laird v. Snow (Laird v. Snow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1664
JOHN LAIRD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN SNOW, Secretary, US Department of the Treasury,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (CA-03- 2717-RWT)
Submitted: February 9, 2005 Decided: February 22, 2005
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frederic M. Brandes, Timonium, Maryland, for Appellant. Thomas M. DiBiagio, United States Attorney, John W. Sippel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
John Laird appeals the district court’s orders denying
relief on his civil complaint and denying his motion for
reconsideration. We find that Laird’s complaint was untimely filed
for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we
affirm. See Laird v. Snow, No. CA-03-2717-RWT (D. Md. Mar. 17,
2004 & Apr. 15, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Laird v. Snow, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laird-v-snow-ca4-2005.