Laird v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided October 14, 2025·No. 19-0682V·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: September 16, 2025

* * * * * * * * * * * * * LUCINDA LAIRD, * UNPUBLISHED * Petitioner, * No. 19-682V * v. * Special Master Dorsey * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Wendy Cox, Siri & Glimstad LLP, Austin, TX, for Petitioner. Jamica Marie Littles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 1

On May 8, 2019, Lucinda Laird (“Petitioner”) filed a petition in the National Vaccine Injury Program 2 alleging that she suffered a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination administered on October 16, 2017. Petition at Preamble (ECF No. 1); Amended Petition at Preamble (ECF No. 46). The undersigned issued a decision based on stipulation on May 28, 2025. Decision Based on Stipulation dated May 28, 2025 (ECF No. 80).

1 Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (2018) (“Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). All citations in this Decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.

1 On June 10, 2025, Petitioner filed an application for attorneys’ fees and costs. Petitioner’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (“Pet. Mot.”), filed June 10, 2025 (ECF No. 87). Petitioner requests compensation in the amount of $18,131.22, representing $11,364.00 in attorneys’ fees and $67.22 in costs as well as $6,700.00 in costs to Petitioner’s previous counsel. Id. at 1. Petitioner warrants that she has not personally incurred any costs in pursuit of her claim for compensation. Id. at 2; Pet. Exhibit (“Ex.”) 24. Respondent filed his response on June 10, 2025, stating he “is satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are met in this case.” Respondent’s Response to Pet. Mot., filed June 10, 2025, at 2 (ECF No. 88). Petitioner did not file a reply thereafter. The matter is now ripe for disposition.

Petitioner requests the following hourly rates for the work of her counsel: for Ms. Wendy Cox, $430.00 per hour for work performed in 2024 and $450.00 per hour for work performed in 2025. Petitioner also requests rates between $187.00 and $195.00 for work of their counsel’s paralegals performed from 2024 to 2025.

The undersigned finds the rates consistent with what counsel has previously been awarded for their Vaccine Program work, and finds them to be reasonable herein. Additionally, the undersigned has reviewed the submitted billing entries and finds the total number of hours billed to be reasonable and will award them in full.

Lastly, the undersigned has reviewed the requested costs and finds them to be reasonable and largely supported with appropriate documentation. 3 Accordingly, the full amount of costs shall be awarded.

Therefore, the undersigned finds no cause to reduce the requested hours or rates, or the requested costs.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. § 15(e). Based on the reasonableness of Petitioner’s request, the undersigned GRANTS Petitioner’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs.

Accordingly, the undersigned awards:

(1) Petitioner is awarded attorneys’ fees and costs in the total amount of $11,431.22, to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement.

(2) Petitioner is awarded attorneys’ fees and costs in the total amount of $6,700.00, to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s former counsel, Mr. Andrew D. Downing’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement.

3 Petitioner is reminded to include documentation to support research costs in future fees and costs motions.

2 In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with this Decision. 4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Special Master

4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Laird v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2025).

Laird v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Laird v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a