Laird v. Mayor of De Soto

25 F. 76, 1885 U.S. App. LEXIS 2208
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri
DecidedSeptember 30, 1885
StatusPublished

This text of 25 F. 76 (Laird v. Mayor of De Soto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laird v. Mayor of De Soto, 25 F. 76, 1885 U.S. App. LEXIS 2208 (circtedmo 1885).

Opinion

Brewer, J.,

(orally.) In this ease a judgment was rendered against the defendant, an incorporated city, upon certain municipal obligations. An alternative writ was issued without a prior execution. The statutes of Missouri provide that if an execution be issued against an incorporated city and be returned unsatisfied, then a writ of mandamus may go. 1 Rev. St. § 2415. I understand that the practice in this court has conformed to the provisions of this statute. It should so conform. No right of the judgment creditor is lost; all that results is a slight delay. And the acts of congress indicate the propriety, if not the duty, of conformity. Desty, Fed. Proc. § 914; U. S. v. Keokuk, 6 Wall. 514; Moran v. City of Elizabeth, 9 Fed. Rep. 72. Hence the writ was prematurely issued, and the motion to quash will be sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Council of Keokuk
73 U.S. 514 (Supreme Court, 1868)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 F. 76, 1885 U.S. App. LEXIS 2208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laird-v-mayor-of-de-soto-circtedmo-1885.