Laird v. Mayor of De Soto

25 F. 76, 1885 U.S. App. LEXIS 2208
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri·Decided September 30, 1885·Published

Opinion

Brewer, J.,

(orally.) In this ease a judgment was rendered against the defendant, an incorporated city, upon certain municipal obligations. An alternative writ was issued without a prior execution. The statutes of Missouri provide that if an execution be issued against an incorporated city and be returned unsatisfied, then a writ of mandamus may go. 1 Rev. St. § 2415. I understand that the practice in this court has conformed to the provisions of this statute. It should so conform. No right of the judgment creditor is lost; all that results is a slight delay. And the acts of congress indicate the propriety, if not the duty, of conformity. Desty, Fed. Proc. § 914; U. S. v. Keokuk, 6 Wall. 514; Moran v. City of Elizabeth, 9 Fed. Rep. 72. Hence the writ was prematurely issued, and the motion to quash will be sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Laird v. Mayor of De Soto, 25 F. 76, 1885 U.S. App. LEXIS 2208 (circtedmo 1885).

25 F. 76 (Laird v. Mayor of De Soto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Council of Keokuk
73 U.S. 514 (Supreme Court, 1868)