Laird v. Frieberg, Klien & Co.

2 Wilson 99
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 1, 1884·No. No. 1572·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 110. Appeal bond injustice’s court; time of filing. If an appeal bond in justice’s court be filed within ten days, after an order overruling a motion for new trial in the case, it is filed within the time required by law. [Ante, § 49.]

§ 111. Same; description of judgment in. The appeal bond described the judgment by stating the style and number of the case, and the date of the judgment, correctly. In stating the amount of the judgment there was a discrepancy of one cent. The judgment was for $(>1.91, while the bond described it as a judgment for $61.90. Held, that this discrepancy did not vitiate the bond. [W. & W. Con. Rep. § 1236.]

§ 112. Same; conditions of. The bond was conditioned that appellant would prosecute his appeal “'with effect ” instead of “to effect.” Held, this did not vitiate the bond. [Franklin v. Tiernan, 56 Tex. 618.] The county court held the appeal bond insufficient and dismissed the appeal. Held, error.

Eeversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Laird v. Frieberg, Klien & Co., 2 Wilson 99 (Tex. Ct. App. 1884).

2 Wilson 99 (Laird v. Frieberg, Klien & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Franklin v. Tiernan
56 Tex. 618 (Texas Supreme Court, 1882)