Laird v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

97 F.2d 730, 21 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 574, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4762
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 29, 1938·No. 8678·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

*731 FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

The question presented for decision in this case is whether petitioner, who had executed an oil and gas lease for a consideration paid partly in cash and to he paid partly out of oil to be produced from the lease, but without retaining a royalty interest, was entitled to depletion on the cash received The Board decided that petitioner was not entitled to claim depletion on the cash payment. We may refer to the opinion of the Board for the facts in detail without repeating them. See 35 B.T.A. 75. On the authority of Commissioner v. Fleming, 5 Cir., 82 F.2d 324; Blankenship v. United States, 5 Cir., 95 F.2d 507; Helvering v. O’Donnell, 58 S.Ct. 619, 82 L.Ed. -; and Helvering v. Elbe Oil Land Development Co., 58 S.Ct. 621, 82 L.Ed. -, the decision of the Board is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Laird v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 97 F.2d 730, 21 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 574, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4762 (5th Cir. 1938).

97 F.2d 730 (Laird v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Badger Oil Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
118 F.2d 791 (Fifth Circuit, 1941)
Cullen v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
118 F.2d 651 (Fifth Circuit, 1941)
Commissioner v. Roeser & Pendleton, Inc.
118 F.2d 462 (Fifth Circuit, 1941)
Hammonds v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
106 F.2d 420 (Tenth Circuit, 1939)