Laird v. Clearfield & Mahoning Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Laird v. Clearfield & Mahoning Railway Co.

873 A.2d 697, 582 Pa. 559, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 854

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 26, 2005

DocketPetition No. 295 WAL 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 873 A.2d 697 (Laird v. Clearfield & Mahoning Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Laird v. Clearfield & Mahoning Railway Co., 873 A.2d 697, 582 Pa. 559, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 854 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issue:

Whether the trial court’s order rendering judgment “upon agreement and stipulation of the parties,” with damages “as limited by previous rulings of this Court” and in the context of the trial court’s on-the-record contemplation of “an order that would preserve any and all rights [Petitioners] have for appellate review on any prior proceeding in this case,” had [560]*560the effect of foreclosing Petitioners’ appeal rights relative to such prior proceedings and/or rulings?

The matter is taken as submitted on the briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issue:

Whether the trial court’s order rendering judgment “upon agreement and stipulation of the parties,” with damages “as limited by previous rulings of this Court” and in the context of the trial court’s on-the-record contemplation of “an order that would preserve any and all rights [Petitioners] have for appellate review on any prior proceeding in this case,” had [560]*560the effect of foreclosing Petitioners’ appeal rights relative to such prior proceedings and/or rulings?

The matter is taken as submitted on the briefs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

873 A.2d 697, 582 Pa. 559, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laird-v-clearfield-mahoning-railway-co-pa-2005.