Laird v. Beebe
33 Haw. 910, 1936 Haw. LEXIS 15
Opinion
Defendant-appellee has interposed a motion to dismiss plaintiff-appellant’s bill of exceptions alleging that “there is no proper bill of exceptions before this court.” An examination of the bill of exceptions convinces us that the motion is without merit and should be denied. '
Motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Laird v. Beebe, 33 Haw. 910, 1936 Haw. LEXIS 15 (haw 1936).
33 Haw. 910 (Laird v. Beebe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.