Laird v. Beebe

33 Haw. 910, 1936 Haw. LEXIS 15
CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 27, 1936
DocketNo. 2296.
StatusPublished

This text of 33 Haw. 910 (Laird v. Beebe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laird v. Beebe, 33 Haw. 910, 1936 Haw. LEXIS 15 (haw 1936).

Opinion

Per Guriam.

Defendant-appellee has interposed a motion to dismiss plaintiff-appellant’s bill of exceptions alleging that “there is no proper bill of exceptions before this court.” An examination of the bill of exceptions convinces us that the motion is without merit and should be denied. '

Motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Haw. 910, 1936 Haw. LEXIS 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laird-v-beebe-haw-1936.