Laird v. Bannon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Laird v. Bannon

1912 OK 193, 122 P. 180, 31 Okla. 627, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 114

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 12, 1912

Docket2483

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 1912 OK 193 (Laird v. Bannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Laird v. Bannon, 1912 OK 193, 122 P. 180, 31 Okla. 627, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 114 (Okla. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

DUNN, J.

This case presents error from the superior court of Oklahoma county. The proceeding is not instituted by either case-made or bill of exceptions, but is here upon a transcript of the record. The only assignment of error contained in the petition in error is that the court erred in overruling the motion of plaintiff in error for a new trial. A motion to dismiss has been filed by counsel for defendant in error for the reason that the record before us presents no error subject to review. This motion must be sustained. That motions are no part of the record proper and are not brought to this court on a transcript thereof, see McMechan v. Christy, 3 Okla. 301, 41 Pac. 382, Tribal Development Co. et al. v. White Bros. et al., 28 Okla. 525, 114 Pac. 736, and cases therein cited.

The cause is, accordingly, dismissed.

TURNER, C. J., and HAYES and ICANE, JJ., concur; WILLIAMS, J., absent, and not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DUNN, J.

This case presents error from the superior court of Oklahoma county. The proceeding is not instituted by either case-made or bill of exceptions, but is here upon a transcript of the record. The only assignment of error contained in the petition in error is that the court erred in overruling the motion of plaintiff in error for a new trial. A motion to dismiss has been filed by counsel for defendant in error for the reason that the record before us presents no error subject to review. This motion must be sustained. That motions are no part of the record proper and are not brought to this court on a transcript thereof, see McMechan v. Christy, 3 Okla. 301, 41 Pac. 382, Tribal Development Co. et al. v. White Bros. et al., 28 Okla. 525, 114 Pac. 736, and cases therein cited.

The cause is, accordingly, dismissed.

TURNER, C. J., and HAYES and ICANE, JJ., concur; WILLIAMS, J., absent, and not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK 193, 122 P. 180, 31 Okla. 627, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laird-v-bannon-okla-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack