Lair v. ORTHO BIOTECH

Michigan Supreme Court

Lair v. ORTHO BIOTECH

723 N.W.2d 897, 477 Mich. 952

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided November 30, 2006·No. 131188·Published

Opinion

723 N.W.2d 897 (2006)

Lorri Ann LAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ORTHO BIOTECH, a/k/a Johnson & Johnson, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 131188. COA No. 263405.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

November 30, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

723 N.W.2d 897 (2006)

Lorri Ann LAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ORTHO BIOTECH, a/k/a Johnson & Johnson, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 131188. COA No. 263405.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

November 30, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Lair v. ORTHO BIOTECH, 723 N.W.2d 897, 477 Mich. 952 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

723 N.W.2d 897 (Lair v. ORTHO BIOTECH) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Lorri Ann LAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ORTHO BIOTECH, a/k/a Johnson & Johnson, Defendant-Appellee.

Lorri Ann LAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ORTHO BIOTECH, a/k/a Johnson & Johnson, Defendant-Appellee.