Lair v. Mayfield

46 Ill. 500
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1868
StatusPublished

This text of 46 Ill. 500 (Lair v. Mayfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lair v. Mayfield, 46 Ill. 500 (Ill. 1868).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Lawrence

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an action of ejectment, brought by Lair, against Mayfield, in which the plaintiff claimed title under a deed executed in 1831, by the county commissioners of Macoupin county, to Joseph Buningh, Ezekiel Good, James P. Smith, David Gimlin, and himself. The deed described the grantees as “ Trustees of the Carlinville School Hnion,” and ran to them and their successors in office, “ for the use and benefit of the inhabitants of Carlinville and its vicinity.” The plaintiff proved the death of all the grantees except himself, and claimed title to the entire premises as the survivor. The defendant proved color of title and payment of taxes, from 1857 to I860, inclusive, during which time, the lot in question, was vacant and unoccupied.

It is urged by the plaintiff in error, that the property in controversy was school land, and therefore not taxable, and that the limitation law has no application. We can only say, the record wholly fails to disclose what was, in this respect, the character of this land. We are not informed what the Carlinville School Union was. We do not know whether it was an incorporated institution, a private association, or what were its powers and objects, or whether it is now in existence. We may infer from the name, that it was an association of some sort, having some reference to schools, but we can infer nothing more. This name, and the evidence that the town lot in question, more than thirty-five years ago, had a small log school house upon it, and was then known in the town of Carlinville as the school lot, are all there is in the record to show this was school property, and we do not regard this as sufficient evidence to take the case out of the statute of limitations. The judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 Ill. 500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lair-v-mayfield-ill-1868.