Laino v. New York

374 U.S. 104, 83 S. Ct. 1687, 10 L. Ed. 2d 1027, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1282
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 10, 1963·No. 992·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and. the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of. certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Laino v. New York, 374 U.S. 104, 83 S. Ct. 1687, 10 L. Ed. 2d 1027, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1282 (1963).

374 U.S. 104 (Laino v. New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Messina v. Bellmore Fire District Commission
242 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Figueroa v. Figueroa
160 A.D.2d 390 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Pinkerton v. State
784 P.2d 671 (Court of Appeals of Alaska, 1989)
People v. D'Amico
138 A.D.2d 943 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Flihan
131 A.D.2d 269 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Brockway v. Monroe
89 A.D.2d 771 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
State Ex Rel. Pollard v. Criminal Ct. of Marion Cty.
329 N.E.2d 573 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1975)
United States ex rel. Zevin v. Cahn
282 F. Supp. 275 (E.D. New York, 1968)
State v. Sarcone
233 A.2d 406 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)
United States ex rel. Laino v. Wallack
231 F. Supp. 733 (S.D. New York, 1964)