Laino v. Laino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Laino v. Laino

236 A.D.2d 247, 654 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1157

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 11, 1997·Published

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jacqueline Silbermann, J.), entered on or about June 8, 1995, which, inter alia, distributed the marital property and awarded plaintiff maintenance, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We find the distribution to be equitable "even if the parties may not have received an exactly 50-50 division of the marital property” (Wallach v Wallach, 204 AD2d 211, 212), and that the court properly exercised its discretion as to matters involving the amount and duration of maintenance, child support and counsel fees (see, Kreizel v Kreizel, 201 AD2d 318). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jacqueline Silbermann, J.), entered on or about June 8, 1995, which, inter alia, distributed the marital property and awarded plaintiff maintenance, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We find the distribution to be equitable "even if the parties may not have received an exactly 50-50 division of the marital property” (Wallach v Wallach, 204 AD2d 211, 212), and that the court properly exercised its discretion as to matters involving the amount and duration of maintenance, child support and counsel fees (see, Kreizel v Kreizel, 201 AD2d 318). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach and Williams, JJ.

Laino v. Laino, 236 A.D.2d 247, 654 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1157 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

236 A.D.2d 247 (Laino v. Laino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related