Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Laino v. Laino

Laino v. Laino

686 So. 2d 786, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 213, 1997 WL 20751
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 22, 1997·No. No. 96-3587·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the order disqualifying counsel for petitioner is quashed. See Pascucci v. Pascucci, 679 So.2d 1311 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). This is without prejudice to respondent’s filing a renewed motion to disqualify should new information develop which has not been presented to the trial court.

WARNER, PARIENTE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Laino v. Laino, 686 So. 2d 786, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 213, 1997 WL 20751 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

686 So. 2d 786 (Laino v. Laino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pascucci v. Pascucci
679 So. 2d 1311 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)