Laing v. Gallegos

167 F. App'x 683

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Footnotes

•

**

Richard Laing, committed to Oregon State Hospital after being found guilty except for insanity of second degree assault, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. We grant Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal.

Appellee has informed this court that appellant failed to return from an unsupervised afternoon pass while a patient at Oregon State Hospital and his current whereabouts are unknown. Accordingly, dismissal is proper. See Molinaro v. New Jersey, 396 U.S. 365, 366, 90 S.Ct. 498, 24 L.Ed.2d 586 (1970) (holding that a fugitive is disentitled from calling upon the resources of the court for determination of his claims); see also Conforte v. Commissioner, 692 F.2d 587, 589-90 (9th Cir.1982) (extending the fugitive disentitlement doctrine to civil proceedings).

This appeal is dismissed with prejudice subject to the following qualification: if appellant surrenders to authorities within 42 days of the filing date of this order, appellant may move for reinstatement of this appeal. See United States v. Freelove, 816 F.2d 479, 480 (9th Cir.1987).

DISMISSED

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.