Laing v. Fox

293 U.S. 525, 55 S. Ct. 126, 79 L. Ed. 636, 1934 U.S. LEXIS 62
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 22, 1934·No. No. 433·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Southwestern Oil Co. v. Texas, 217 U. S. 114, 121; Brown-Forman Co. v. Kentucky, 217 U. S. 563, 572 et seq.; American Sugar Refining Co. v. Louisiana, 179 U. S. 89, 95; Hicklin v. Coney, 290 U. S. 169, 176. (2) League v. Texas, 184 U. S. 156, 161; Kentucky Union Co. v. Kentucky, 219 U. S. 140, 152-153; Magnano Co. v. Hamilton, 292 U. S. 40, 44; (3) Knights of Pythias v. Meyer, 265 U. S. 30, 32-33; Hicklin v. Coney, 290 U. S. 169, 172; Hartford Accident Co. v. Nelson Co., 291 U. S. 352, 358; Swiss Oil Corp. v. Shanks, 273 U. S., 407, 413.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Laing v. Fox, 293 U.S. 525, 55 S. Ct. 126, 79 L. Ed. 636, 1934 U.S. LEXIS 62 (1934).

293 U.S. 525 (Laing v. Fox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related