Laing v. Fox

293 U.S. 525, 55 S. Ct. 126, 79 L. Ed. 636, 1934 U.S. LEXIS 62
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 22, 1934
DocketNo. 433
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 293 U.S. 525 (Laing v. Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laing v. Fox, 293 U.S. 525, 55 S. Ct. 126, 79 L. Ed. 636, 1934 U.S. LEXIS 62 (1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Southwestern Oil Co. v. Texas, 217 U. S. 114, 121; Brown-Forman Co. v. Kentucky, 217 U. S. 563, 572 et seq.; American Sugar Refining Co. v. Louisiana, 179 U. S. 89, 95; Hicklin v. Coney, 290 U. S. 169, 176. (2) League v. Texas, 184 U. S. 156, 161; Kentucky Union Co. v. Kentucky, 219 U. S. 140, 152-153; Magnano Co. v. Hamilton, 292 U. S. 40, 44; (3) Knights of Pythias v. Meyer, 265 U. S. 30, 32-33; Hicklin v. Coney, 290 U. S. 169, 172; Hartford Accident Co. v. Nelson Co., 291 U. S. 352, 358; Swiss Oil Corp. v. Shanks, 273 U. S., 407, 413.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
293 U.S. 525, 55 S. Ct. 126, 79 L. Ed. 636, 1934 U.S. LEXIS 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laing-v-fox-scotus-1934.