Laing v. Fox
This text of 293 U.S. 525 (Laing v. Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Southwestern Oil Co. v. Texas, 217 U. S. 114, 121; Brown-Forman Co. v. Kentucky, 217 U. S. 563, 572 et seq.; American Sugar Refining Co. v. Louisiana, 179 U. S. 89, 95; Hicklin v. Coney, 290 U. S. 169, 176. (2) League v. Texas, 184 U. S. 156, 161; Kentucky Union Co. v. Kentucky, 219 U. S. 140, 152-153; Magnano Co. v. Hamilton, 292 U. S. 40, 44; (3) Knights of Pythias v. Meyer, 265 U. S. 30, 32-33; Hicklin v. Coney, 290 U. S. 169, 172; Hartford Accident Co. v. Nelson Co., 291 U. S. 352, 358; Swiss Oil Corp. v. Shanks, 273 U. S., 407, 413.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
293 U.S. 525, 55 S. Ct. 126, 79 L. Ed. 636, 1934 U.S. LEXIS 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laing-v-fox-scotus-1934.