Lainesse v. St. Clairs Cafeteria

Supreme Court of Florida

Lainesse v. St. Clairs Cafeteria

184 So. 2d 423, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3790

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMarch 23, 1966

DocketNo. 34935

StatusPublished

This text of 184 So. 2d 423 (Lainesse v. St. Clairs Cafeteria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lainesse v. St. Clairs Cafeteria, 184 So. 2d 423, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3790 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 27, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that [424]*424there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition for writ of certiorari and the petition for attorney’s fees are both denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI