Laimbeer v. People ex rel. Swineburn

48 Ill. 490
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1868
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 48 Ill. 490 (Laimbeer v. People ex rel. Swineburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laimbeer v. People ex rel. Swineburn, 48 Ill. 490 (Ill. 1868).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Bbeese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This case is to be decided on the first section of article 6 of the township organization law of 1861. That section is as follows:

“ No person shall be eligible to any town office unless he shall have been one year a resident of such town.”

At the November election in 1866, the plaintiff in error was elected a constable of the town of Cicero, in Cook county.

William Swineburn, his unsuccessful competitor for the office, sued out an information in the nature of a quo warranto, predicated on the allegation that plaintiff in error, at the time of the election, was not, and had not been, one year a resident of that town, and was, therefore, ineligible. An issue was made upon this allegation, and submitted to a jury, who found, under instructions from the court, that he was not, and had not been a resident of the town of Cicero one year before the election.

We see no error in the instructions, and the evidence fully sustains the verdict, that plaintiff' in error was not a resident of the town of Cicero one year previous to his election. There is no evidence to sustain that proposition. His residence can only be counted from the month of March preceding the election. Before that time, in 1860, he had been a resident of Cicero ; in 1861 he removed with his family to Chicago. In the same year he entered the army, leaving his family in Chicago, living in the eleventh ward. In 1864 he had a farm and lived on it, in Missouri, with his wife, children and brother-in-law. In March, 1866, he returned to Cicero to reside, and was, at the following November election, chosen a constable of the town. This office he held without the warrant or authority of law, and the judgment of ouster was proper and must he affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People Ex Rel. Romano v. Krantz
150 N.E.2d 627 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 Ill. 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laimbeer-v-people-ex-rel-swineburn-ill-1868.