Laimbeer v. Brown Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Laimbeer v. Brown Bros.

173 A.D. 978

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1916·Published

Opinion

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. This court is of opinion that it was error to exclude the testimony of the plaintiff as to the condition of the top of the wall in question when he last saw it before the time of the accident, in view of his testimony that no work had been done at the top of the wall between the time he saw it and the happening of the accident. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. This court is of opinion that it was error to exclude the testimony of the plaintiff as to the condition of the top of the wall in question when he last saw it before the time of the accident, in view of his testimony that no work had been done at the top of the wall between the time he saw it and the happening of the accident. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Laimbeer v. Brown Bros., 173 A.D. 978 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

173 A.D. 978 (Laimbeer v. Brown Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.