Lail v. State
314 So. 2d 234, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13733
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 13, 1975·No. No. 74-1364·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Defendant being in gross violation of Rule 3.200, F.R.Cr.P., and there being no good cause displayed to support a court waiver of its requirements, it is our view that the trial court correctly administered the Rule within the allowable limits of his discretion in excluding defendant’s alibi witness. Chester v. State, 276 So.2d 76 (2d DCA Fla.1973). See Williams v. State, 264 So.2d 106 (4th DCA Fla.1972).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lail v. State, 314 So. 2d 234, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13733 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).
314 So. 2d 234 (Lail v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Austin v. State
461 So. 2d 1380 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Lewis v. State
411 So. 2d 880 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Garcia v. State
380 So. 2d 565 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)