Lail v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lail v. State

314 So. 2d 234, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13733

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 13, 1975

DocketNo. 74-1364

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 314 So. 2d 234 (Lail v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lail v. State, 314 So. 2d 234, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13733 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant being in gross violation of Rule 3.200, F.R.Cr.P., and there being no good cause displayed to support a court waiver of its requirements, it is our view that the trial court correctly administered the Rule within the allowable limits of his discretion in excluding defendant’s alibi witness. Chester v. State, 276 So.2d 76 (2d DCA Fla.1973). See Williams v. State, 264 So.2d 106 (4th DCA Fla.1972).

Affirmed.

WALDEN and MAGER, JJ„ and GRID-LEY, WILLIAM C., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant being in gross violation of Rule 3.200, F.R.Cr.P., and there being no good cause displayed to support a court waiver of its requirements, it is our view that the trial court correctly administered the Rule within the allowable limits of his discretion in excluding defendant’s alibi witness. Chester v. State, 276 So.2d 76 (2d DCA Fla.1973). See Williams v. State, 264 So.2d 106 (4th DCA Fla.1972).

Affirmed.

WALDEN and MAGER, JJ„ and GRID-LEY, WILLIAM C., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

314 So. 2d 234, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lail-v-state-fladistctapp-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack