Lail ex rel. Lail v. Chapman
127 S.E.2d 581, 257 N.C. 797, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 615
This text of 127 S.E.2d 581 (Lail ex rel. Lail v. Chapman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lail ex rel. Lail v. Chapman, 127 S.E.2d 581, 257 N.C. 797, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 615 (N.C. 1962).
Opinion
The plaintiffs’ evidence makes out a clear case of sudden emergency. That Chapman was curious as to the identity of the woman driver who forced him off the road, gave voice to that curiosity, and a fleeting glance in the direction of her departure, are not enough to establish actionable negligence. The judgments of non-suit are
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Henry Dewitt Shank, Jr. v. Alec Baker, Administrator, C.T.A. Of the Estate of Chester Arthur Quick
333 F.2d 301 (Fourth Circuit, 1964)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
127 S.E.2d 581, 257 N.C. 797, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lail-ex-rel-lail-v-chapman-nc-1962.