Lail ex rel. Lail v. Chapman
127 S.E.2d 581, 257 N.C. 797, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 615
Opinion
The plaintiffs’ evidence makes out a clear case of sudden emergency. That Chapman was curious as to the identity of the woman driver who forced him off the road, gave voice to that curiosity, and a fleeting glance in the direction of her departure, are not enough to establish actionable negligence. The judgments of non-suit are
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lail ex rel. Lail v. Chapman, 127 S.E.2d 581, 257 N.C. 797, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 615 (N.C. 1962).
127 S.E.2d 581 (Lail ex rel. Lail v. Chapman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry Dewitt Shank, Jr. v. Alec Baker, Administrator, C.T.A. Of the Estate of Chester Arthur Quick
333 F.2d 301 (Fourth Circuit, 1964)