Laidler v. State
785 So. 2d 503, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8313, 1999 WL 452147
Opinion
Affirmed. See C.L.B. v. State, 689 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (holding that respondent properly adjudicated delinquent for disorderly conduct where his nonverbal acts disturbed or interfered with an arrest); K.G. v. State, 338 So.2d 72 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976) (holding that arrest for disorderly conduct is not unconstitutional if person arrested obstructed officers’ execution of their legal duty, and was not based only on comments uttered).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Laidler v. State, 785 So. 2d 503, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8313, 1999 WL 452147 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
785 So. 2d 503 (Laidler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
K. G. v. State
338 So. 2d 72 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
C.L.B. v. State
689 So. 2d 1171 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)