Laidler v. State

785 So. 2d 503, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8313, 1999 WL 452147
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 23, 1999
DocketNo. 98-1137
StatusPublished

This text of 785 So. 2d 503 (Laidler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laidler v. State, 785 So. 2d 503, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8313, 1999 WL 452147 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See C.L.B. v. State, 689 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (holding that respondent properly adjudicated delinquent for disorderly conduct where his nonverbal acts disturbed or interfered with an arrest); K.G. v. State, 338 So.2d 72 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976) (holding that arrest for disorderly conduct is not unconstitutional if person arrested obstructed officers’ execution of their legal duty, and was not based only on comments uttered).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

K. G. v. State
338 So. 2d 72 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
C.L.B. v. State
689 So. 2d 1171 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
785 So. 2d 503, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8313, 1999 WL 452147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laidler-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.