Laidler v. Polk County Board of County Commissioners

697 So. 2d 875, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6737, 1997 WL 330413
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 18, 1997·No. No. 96-02580·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Vivian A. Laidler appeals the denial of her claim for unemployment compensation benefits. The appeals referee found that Laidler voluntarily left her employment without good cause attributable to the employer. See § 443.101, Fla. Stat. (1995). The Unemployment Appeals Commission affirmed the appeals referee’s decision. On appeal to this court, the Commission’s order is entitled to a presumption of correctness. See Kelle v. D.H. Holmes Co., Ltd., 658 So.2d 1161 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Although there was evidence to support Laidler’s claim, there was also competent, substantial evidence to support the appeals referee’s decision. Therefore, we affirm the determination that Laidler is not eligible for unemployment compensation benefits.

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and BLUE and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Laidler v. Polk County Board of County Commissioners, 697 So. 2d 875, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6737, 1997 WL 330413 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

697 So. 2d 875 (Laidler v. Polk County Board of County Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelle v. DH Holmes Co., Ltd.
658 So. 2d 1161 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)