Laicher v. New Orleans, Jackson, & Great Northern Railroad

28 La. Ann. 320
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 15, 1876·No. No. 4643·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

On Motion to Dismiss.

Wyly, J.

The plaintiff moves to dismiss this appeal because tho transcript was not filed in this court within three judicial days from the return day.

It appears that on tho twentieth ofj December, 1872, the defendant filed a petition for appeal, and the judge, in granting the order, omitted to fix a return day. Subsequently, to wit: on the eighth of March, 1873, he made an order fixing the return day on the third Monday of March, 1873, at which time the transcript was filed in this court.

[321]*321The fault in not fixing the return day is not attributable to the appellant. It was an error of the judge, and the appeal can not be dismissed on account thereof. Revised Statutes of 1870, section 36.

The motion to dismiss is therefore denied. 10 An. 779.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Laicher v. New Orleans, Jackson, & Great Northern Railroad, 28 La. Ann. 320 (La. 1876).

28 La. Ann. 320 (Laicher v. New Orleans, Jackson, & Great Northern Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Busbey v. Hamiter-Busbey Mill & Elevator Co.
51 So. 184 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1909)
Barnhill v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.
33 So. 63 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1902)