Laich v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections

18 A.3d 1094

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 28, 2011·No. 33 WAP 2010·Published

Opinion

18 A.3d 1094 (2011)

Scott A. LAICH, Appellant
v.
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Jeffrey A. Beard (Secretary of Corrections), Gerald Rozum (Superintendent SCI-Somerset), Jack Loughry (Business Manager), Delores Chaney (Inmate Accounts), M. Bentz (Inmate Accounts Supervisor), Dorinda Varner (Chief Grievance Officer), Appellees.

No. 33 WAP 2010.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

April 28, 2011.

1095 ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of April, 2011, the order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Jurisdiction relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

18 A.3d 1094 (2011)

Scott A. LAICH, Appellant
v.
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Jeffrey A. Beard (Secretary of Corrections), Gerald Rozum (Superintendent SCI-Somerset), Jack Loughry (Business Manager), Delores Chaney (Inmate Accounts), M. Bentz (Inmate Accounts Supervisor), Dorinda Varner (Chief Grievance Officer), Appellees.

No. 33 WAP 2010.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

April 28, 2011.

1095 ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of April, 2011, the order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Jurisdiction relinquished.

Laich v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, 18 A.3d 1094 (Pa. 2011).

Pincite

18 A.3d 1094 (Laich v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.