Lai Har Chin v. Yard

40 A.D.3d 590, 833 N.Y.S.2d 405
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 1, 2007·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for

personal injuries, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Johnson, J.), dated September 14, 2006, as denied his motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CFLR 3012 (b).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendant waived late service of the complaint by accept[591]*591ing and retaining the complaint, without objection, before moving to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b) approximately eight months later (see Ligotti v Wilson, 287 AD2d 550, 551 [2001]; Chiulli v Coyne, 210 AD2d 450 [1994]; Myers v Empire State Bldg., 53 AD2d 662, 663 [1976]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss. Mastro, J.P., Ritter, Skelos, Garni and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lai Har Chin v. Yard, 40 A.D.3d 590, 833 N.Y.S.2d 405 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

40 A.D.3d 590 (Lai Har Chin v. Yard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castro v. Pfizer, Inc.
2020 NY Slip Op 2916 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Betancourt v. Delta Airlines, Inc.
60 A.D.3d 609 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)