Lahrizi v. State
900 So. 2d 707, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6015, 2005 WL 956964
This text of 900 So. 2d 707 (Lahrizi v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lahrizi v. State, 900 So. 2d 707, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6015, 2005 WL 956964 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
Opinion
Finding no abuse of discretion on the face of this record with the court’s conduct regarding the Nelson and Farretta inquiries, we affirm the conviction and sentence. Weaver v. State, 894 So.2d 178 (Fla.2004); Maxwell v. State, 892 So.2d 1100 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Wilson v. State, 889 So.2d 114 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Maxwell v. State
892 So. 2d 1100 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Wilson v. State
889 So. 2d 114 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Weaver v. State
894 So. 2d 178 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
900 So. 2d 707, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6015, 2005 WL 956964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lahrizi-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.