Lahr v. Williams

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lahr v. Williams

342 S.W.3d 907, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 862, 2011 WL 2456377

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 21, 2011·No. ED 95524·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jason L. Williams and Sheryl A. Williams appeal from the trial court’s establishment of a private road on their real property at the request of Guy M. Lahr, III, and the judgment following a jury trial finding their damages as a result of the private road to be $1,300.00.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jason L. Williams and Sheryl A. Williams appeal from the trial court’s establishment of a private road on their real property at the request of Guy M. Lahr, III, and the judgment following a jury trial finding their damages as a result of the private road to be $1,300.00.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Lahr v. Williams, 342 S.W.3d 907, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 862, 2011 WL 2456377 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

342 S.W.3d 907 (Lahr v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related