LaHatte v. Walton

184 S.E. 278, 181 Ga. 785, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 432
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 21, 1936
DocketNo. 10940
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 184 S.E. 278 (LaHatte v. Walton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
LaHatte v. Walton, 184 S.E. 278, 181 Ga. 785, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 432 (Ga. 1936).

Opinion

The questions propounded by the Court of Appeals came before the entire court composed of six Justices. Russell, Chief Justice, Beck, Presiding Justice, and Bell, Justice, being of the opinion that both questions should be answered in the affirmative, and Atkinson, Gilbert, and Hutcheson, Justices, being of the opinion that they should both be answered in the negative, the questions must be returned to the Court of Appeals without instruction, since the court being evenly divided can not agree what answers should be given to the questions propounded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aetna Insurance Company v. Martin
12 S.E.2d 633 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
LaHatte v. Walton
184 S.E. 742 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 S.E. 278, 181 Ga. 785, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lahatte-v-walton-ga-1936.