Laguna (Joseph) Vs. State
This text of Laguna (Joseph) Vs. State (Laguna (Joseph) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JOSEPH LAGUNA, AJIVA JOEY No. 80484 LAGUNA, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, a 73 Respondent. i7.1- ERCIAN CLERI - BY
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth judicial District Court, Clark County; Carolyn Ellsworth, Judge. This court's review of this appeal reveals jurisdictional defects. Specifically, the notice of appeal was untimely filed. See NRAP 34.575; Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 871 P.2d 944 (1994). Moreover, appellant has previously appealed the order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus in Docket No. 78867. A second duplicate appeal may not be pursued. Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Hardesty Cadish 6W, ,J. cc: Hon. Carolyn Ellsworth, District Judge Joseph Laguna Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
StoPRENE COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 4WD 2 4:k
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Laguna (Joseph) Vs. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laguna-joseph-vs-state-nev-2020.