Lagudis v. Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lagudis v. Division of Housing & Community Renewal

169 A.D.2d 638, 565 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 727

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 29, 1991·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William J. Davis, J.), entered November 8, 1989, which denied and dismissed the CPLR article 78 petition challenging an order of the respondent New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal which reversed the Rent Administrator’s dismissal of a tenant’s objection to the registered rent on grounds of untimeliness, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We do not disturb the respondent’s conclusion that the proceeding was timely commenced. Since its order remanding the proceeding to the District Rent Administrator for further consideration of the merits of the tenant’s objection to the registered rent was not final agency action, the petition was properly dismissed. (See, Matter of 140 W. 57th St. Corp. v State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 130 AD2d 237; Rent Stabilization Code [9 NYCRR] § 2530.1.) Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Smith and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William J. Davis, J.), entered November 8, 1989, which denied and dismissed the CPLR article 78 petition challenging an order of the respondent New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal which reversed the Rent Administrator’s dismissal of a tenant’s objection to the registered rent on grounds of untimeliness, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We do not disturb the respondent’s conclusion that the proceeding was timely commenced. Since its order remanding the proceeding to the District Rent Administrator for further consideration of the merits of the tenant’s objection to the registered rent was not final agency action, the petition was properly dismissed. (See, Matter of 140 W. 57th St. Corp. v State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 130 AD2d 237; Rent Stabilization Code [9 NYCRR] § 2530.1.) Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Smith and Rubin, JJ.

Lagudis v. Division of Housing & Community Renewal, 169 A.D.2d 638, 565 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 727 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

169 A.D.2d 638 (Lagudis v. Division of Housing & Community Renewal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related