LaGuardia v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

LaGuardia v. City of New York

237 A.D.2d 257, 655 N.Y.S.2d 395, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2171

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 3, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 237 A.D.2d 257 (LaGuardia v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

LaGuardia v. City of New York, 237 A.D.2d 257, 655 N.Y.S.2d 395, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2171 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ramirez, J.), dated October 30, 1996, which, upon an order of the same court dated February 14, 1996, granting the defendant’s oral motion to dismiss the complaint, is in favor of the defendant. The notice of appeal from the order dated February 14,1996, is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5520 [c]).

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the order dated February 14, 1996, is vacated, and the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint is denied.

The defendant’s oral motion to dismiss the complaint was unsupported by affidavits, sworn testimony, or any other competent submission which would warrant granting it (see, Kaiser v J & S Realty, 173 AD2d 920; Double A Limousine Serv. v New York, N. Y. Limousine Serv., 130 AD2d 403; cf., Valenti Elec. Co. v Power Line Constructors, 123 AD2d 604). The record before this Court contains only five pages of oral colloquy and the Supreme Court’s handwritten order. Inasmuch as the record fails to support the defendant’s entitlement to judgment, the judgment appealed from must be reversed and the motion denied. O’Brien, J. P., Thompson, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ramirez, J.), dated October 30, 1996, which, upon an order of the same court dated February 14, 1996, granting the defendant’s oral motion to dismiss the complaint, is in favor of the defendant. The notice of appeal from the order dated February 14,1996, is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5520 [c]).

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the order dated February 14, 1996, is vacated, and the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint is denied.

The defendant’s oral motion to dismiss the complaint was unsupported by affidavits, sworn testimony, or any other competent submission which would warrant granting it (see, Kaiser v J & S Realty, 173 AD2d 920; Double A Limousine Serv. v New York, N. Y. Limousine Serv., 130 AD2d 403; cf., Valenti Elec. Co. v Power Line Constructors, 123 AD2d 604). The record before this Court contains only five pages of oral colloquy and the Supreme Court’s handwritten order. Inasmuch as the record fails to support the defendant’s entitlement to judgment, the judgment appealed from must be reversed and the motion denied. O’Brien, J. P., Thompson, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 A.D.2d 257, 655 N.Y.S.2d 395, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laguardia-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack