LaGrone v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

LaGrone v. State

216 S.W.3d 202, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 313, 2007 WL 581939

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 27, 2007·No. No. ED 87761·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James LaGrone appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James LaGrone appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

LaGrone v. State, 216 S.W.3d 202, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 313, 2007 WL 581939 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

216 S.W.3d 202 (LaGrone v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.