Lagos v. Fucale

139 A.D.3d 908, 30 N.Y.S.3d 573
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 18, 2016
Docket2015-03155
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 139 A.D.3d 908 (Lagos v. Fucale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lagos v. Fucale, 139 A.D.3d 908, 30 N.Y.S.3d 573 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Adler, J.), dated March 11, 2015, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside the jury verdict on the issue of damages as contrary to the weight of the evidence or in the interest of justice and for a new trial.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff’s contention that the defendants’ trial counsel made various improper comments during the course of the damages trial is unpreserved for appellate review because the plaintiff either failed to object to these comments at trial (see Jean-Louis v City of New York, 86 AD3d 628, 629 [2011]; Lucian v Schwartz, 55 AD3d 687, 689 [2008]; Murray v Weisenfeld, 37 AD3d 432, 434 [2007]; Friedman v Marcus, 32 AD3d 820, 820 [2006]), or did not seek further curative instructions and did not immediately move for a mistrial (see Jean-Louis v City of New York, 86 AD3d at 629; Vingo v Rosner, 29 AD3d 896, 897 [2006]; Bacigalupo v Healthshield, Inc., 231 AD2d 538, 539 [1996]; Torrado v Lutheran Med. Ctr., 198 AD2d 346, 347 [1993]).

The plaintiff’s remaining contention is without merit.

*909 Leventhal, J.P., Roman, Hinds-Radix and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Masmalaj v. New York City Economic Dev. Corp.
2021 NY Slip Op 05120 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Baynes v. Maple 3, LLC
2019 NY Slip Op 1047 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Castillo v. MTA Bus Co.
2018 NY Slip Op 5134 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Crosby Ex Rel. Crosby v. Barry
2017 NY Slip Op 7705 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 A.D.3d 908, 30 N.Y.S.3d 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lagos-v-fucale-nyappdiv-2016.