Lagoon Rancheria v. State of California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 11, 2014·No. 10-17803·Published

Opinion

FILED

FOR PUBLICATION JUN 11 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BIG LAGOON RANCHERIA, a Nos. 10-17803 federally recognized Indian tribe, 10-17878

Plaintiff - Appellee - Cross- D.C. No. 4:09-cv-01471-CW Appellant,

v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

Defendant - Appellant -

Cross-Appellee.

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Owens and Friedland did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lagoon Rancheria v. State of California, (9th Cir. 2014).

Lagoon Rancheria v. State of California (Lagoon Rancheria v. State of California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.