Lagoon Rancheria v. State of California
This text of Lagoon Rancheria v. State of California (Lagoon Rancheria v. State of California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED FOR PUBLICATION JUN 11 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BIG LAGOON RANCHERIA, a Nos. 10-17803 federally recognized Indian tribe, 10-17878
Plaintiff - Appellee - Cross- D.C. No. 4:09-cv-01471-CW Appellant,
v. ORDER
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
Defendant - Appellant - Cross-Appellee.
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that
this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)
and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as
precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judges Owens and Friedland did not participate in the deliberations or vote
in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lagoon Rancheria v. State of California, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lagoon-rancheria-v-state-of-california-ca9-2014.