Lagi v. State

261 So. 3d 760
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 14, 2019
DocketNo. 1D18-4447
StatusPublished

This text of 261 So. 3d 760 (Lagi v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lagi v. State, 261 So. 3d 760 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant seeks review of orders denying his motions to dismiss. The orders on appeal are not within the scope of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b), which lists the types of orders a criminal defendant may appeal. Interlocutory orders are not generally appealable by criminal defendants. Cf. Hijuelos v. State , 73 So.3d 364, 365 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (noting "a defendant in a criminal proceeding may not bring a separate appeal, which is independent of the plenary appeal from the judgment and sentence, for review of an order denying a motion to suppress"). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Wetherell, Osterhaus, and Winsor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

HIJUELOS v. State
73 So. 3d 364 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 So. 3d 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lagi-v-state-fladistctapp-2019.