Lageza v. Chelsea Fibre Mills

135 A.D. 731, 119 N.Y.S. 906, 1909 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4048
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 10, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 135 A.D. 731 (Lageza v. Chelsea Fibre Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lageza v. Chelsea Fibre Mills, 135 A.D. 731, 119 N.Y.S. 906, 1909 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4048 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Opinion

Jenks, J.:

This action for personal injuries through negligence was brought in the county of Queens. The defendant duly demanded that the place of trial be changed to the county of Hew York. As it appeared that the plaintiff had never been a resident of the county of Queens, but was a resident of the county of Kings when he began [732]*732■his action, and that the defendant was a resident of New York county, the defendant was entitled to the change of venue as a matter of right. (Code Civ. Proc. § 984; Nichols N. Y. Pr. p. 1930, and authorities cited.) This absolute right could not be defeated .by a showing as to the convenience of witnesses» (Veeder v. Baker, 83 N. Y. 156; Mills & Gibb v. Starin, 119 App. Div. 336) After the change has been made, the jilaintiif may then avail himself of either of the 2d and 8d subdivisions of section 987 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (Authorities supra.)

The order must be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion must he granted, with costs.

Burr, Thomas, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and. disbursements,' and motion granted, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hearn v. Farrell Lines, Inc.
278 A.D. 829 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
Seymour v. Bermuda & West Indies Steamship Co.
240 A.D. 849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)
Johnson v. Papen
236 A.D. 601 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)
Ackerman v. Cummiskey
236 A.D. 519 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)
Mayagüez Dock & Shipping Co. v. Soltero
42 P.R. 368 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1931)
Roberts v. Roberts
181 A.D. 886 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 A.D. 731, 119 N.Y.S. 906, 1909 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lageza-v-chelsea-fibre-mills-nyappdiv-1909.