LAGASSE v. State

35 So. 3d 164, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7317, 2010 WL 2076986
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 26, 2010·No. 4D09-3215·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Jeffrey Lagasse appeals a trial court order summarily denying his motion for post conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the order’s summary denial with prejudice as to his claims four through seven, but reverse the order as to its denial of claims one through three. Appellant filed an amendment to his motion for post conviction relief as to those latter claims, but it did not reach the trial court before it denied relief on all grounds. Appellant is entitled under Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007) to have the amendment considered by the trial court on the first three claims.

Affirmed in Part, Reversed and Remanded in Part.

FARMER, HAZOURI and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LAGASSE v. State, 35 So. 3d 164, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7317, 2010 WL 2076986 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

35 So. 3d 164 (LAGASSE v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spera v. State
971 So. 2d 754 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)