Lagary Harrison v. State

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-19-00323-CR __________________

LAGARY HARRISON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee __________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 359th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 96-11-01599-CR __________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 17, 2019, we notified the parties that our jurisdiction was not

apparent from the notice of appeal and warned that the appeal would be dismissed

for want of jurisdiction unless we received a response showing grounds for

continuing the appeal. Harrison did not file a response.

Harrison has failed to demonstrate that the trial court has signed an order that

is appealable at this time. See Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim.

1 App. 1991) (holding that intermediate appellate courts lack jurisdiction to review

interlocutory orders unless that jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

______________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN Chief Justice

Submitted on October 29, 2019 Opinion Delivered October 30, 2019 Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.