Lagary Harrison v. State
This text of Lagary Harrison v. State (Lagary Harrison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-19-00323-CR __________________
LAGARY HARRISON, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee __________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 359th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 96-11-01599-CR __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On September 17, 2019, we notified the parties that our jurisdiction was not
apparent from the notice of appeal and warned that the appeal would be dismissed
for want of jurisdiction unless we received a response showing grounds for
continuing the appeal. Harrison did not file a response.
Harrison has failed to demonstrate that the trial court has signed an order that
is appealable at this time. See Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim.
1 App. 1991) (holding that intermediate appellate courts lack jurisdiction to review
interlocutory orders unless that jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
______________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN Chief Justice
Submitted on October 29, 2019 Opinion Delivered October 30, 2019 Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lagary Harrison v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lagary-harrison-v-state-texapp-2019.