Lagary Harrison v. State
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
NO. 09-19-00323-CR
LAGARY HARRISON, Appellant V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 359th District Court Montgomery County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 96-11-01599-CR
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On September 17, 2019, we notified the parties that our jurisdiction was not apparent from the notice of appeal and warned that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless we received a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. Harrison did not file a response.
Harrison has failed to demonstrate that the trial court has signed an order that is appealable at this time. See Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1991) (holding that intermediate appellate courts lack jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders unless that jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
STEVE McKEITHEN
Chief Justice
Submitted on October 29, 2019 Opinion Delivered October 30, 2019 Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lagary Harrison v. State (Lagary Harrison v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.