Lagares v. Koeppen

Eighth Circuit

Lagares v. Koeppen

693 F. App'x 472

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJuly 24, 2017

DocketNo. 16-2153

StatusPublished

This text of 693 F. App'x 472 (Lagares v. Koeppen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lagares v. Koeppen, 693 F. App'x 472 (8th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dennis Lagares, Jr. and Sherry Lagares appeal from the district court’s¹ order dis[475]*475missing their complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction to the extent that the complaint sought to overturn a state court’s child custody adjudication and for the complaint’s failure to otherwise state a claim. Having considered the Lagares’s arguments for reversal, we find no error in the district court’s analysis and no abuse of discretion in its denial of the Lagareses’ request for further leave to amend.

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Dennis Lagares, Jr. and Sherry Lagares appeal from the district court’s¹ order dis[475]*475missing their complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction to the extent that the complaint sought to overturn a state court’s child custody adjudication and for the complaint’s failure to otherwise state a claim. Having considered the Lagares’s arguments for reversal, we find no error in the district court’s analysis and no abuse of discretion in its denial of the Lagareses’ request for further leave to amend.

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

693 F. App'x 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lagares-v-koeppen-ca8-2017.