Lagarde v. Liberty Shop, Ltd.
This text of 139 So. 67 (Lagarde v. Liberty Shop, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case results from an intersectional collision between a motortruck and an automobile.
The trial court, in dismissing the main and reconventional demands, evidently concluded that both drivers were at fault, and so it seems to us. Both drivers failed to stop or slacken their speed before entering the intersection, and neither saw the other until [68]*68just before tbe impact. Both were guilty of negligence in failing to keep a proper lookout and in failing to stop, or slow down. The fact that the comer where the accident occurred, Chestnut and Josephine streets, is what is known as a “blind crossing,” where it is difficult for drivers approaching the intersection at right angles to see each other, necessitates the exercise of care commensurate with the danger involved.
For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 So. 67, 18 La. App. 573, 1932 La. App. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lagarde-v-liberty-shop-ltd-lactapp-1932.