Lagarde v. Liberty Shop, Ltd.

139 So. 67, 18 La. App. 573, 1932 La. App. LEXIS 65
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 11, 1932
DocketNo. 13849
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 139 So. 67 (Lagarde v. Liberty Shop, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lagarde v. Liberty Shop, Ltd., 139 So. 67, 18 La. App. 573, 1932 La. App. LEXIS 65 (La. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

WESTERFIELD, J.

This case results from an intersectional collision between a motortruck and an automobile.

The trial court, in dismissing the main and reconventional demands, evidently concluded that both drivers were at fault, and so it seems to us. Both drivers failed to stop or slacken their speed before entering the intersection, and neither saw the other until [68]*68just before tbe impact. Both were guilty of negligence in failing to keep a proper lookout and in failing to stop, or slow down. The fact that the comer where the accident occurred, Chestnut and Josephine streets, is what is known as a “blind crossing,” where it is difficult for drivers approaching the intersection at right angles to see each other, necessitates the exercise of care commensurate with the danger involved.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chaney v. Hutches
192 So. 556 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1939)
Toye v. Richmond.
157 So. 556 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 So. 67, 18 La. App. 573, 1932 La. App. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lagarde-v-liberty-shop-ltd-lactapp-1932.