Lagana v. Tessema

Fourth Circuit

Lagana v. Tessema

454 F. App'x 226

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 18, 2011·No. No. 11-7168·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Lagaña appeals the district court’s order granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Lagana’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lagana v. Tessema, No. 8:10-cv-03493-PJM, 2011 WL 3608204 (D.Md. Aug. 15, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Lagaña appeals the district court’s order granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Lagana’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lagana v. Tessema, No. 8:10-cv-03493-PJM, 2011 WL 3608204 (D.Md. Aug. 15, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Lagana v. Tessema, 454 F. App'x 226 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

454 F. App'x 226 (Lagana v. Tessema) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.