Lafredo v. Baltic American Line, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lafredo v. Baltic American Line, Inc.

234 A.D. 768

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1931

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 234 A.D. 768 (Lafredo v. Baltic American Line, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lafredo v. Baltic American Line, Inc., 234 A.D. 768 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

— Motion granted, with ten dollars costs, and appeal dismissed, with costs, upon the ground that the appellant, Bush Terminal Co., Inc., is not an aggrieved party. (Popham v. Twenty-third St. R. R. Co., 48 N. Y. Super. Ct. 229; affd., 89 N. Y. 633; Lane v. New York, New Haven & Hartford R. R. Co., 95 App. Div. 633; Price v. Ryan, 255 N. Y. 16.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Seudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.; Carswell, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Motion granted, with ten dollars costs, and appeal dismissed, with costs, upon the ground that the appellant, Bush Terminal Co., Inc., is not an aggrieved party. (Popham v. Twenty-third St. R. R. Co., 48 N. Y. Super. Ct. 229; affd., 89 N. Y. 633; Lane v. New York, New Haven & Hartford R. R. Co., 95 App. Div. 633; Price v. Ryan, 255 N. Y. 16.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Seudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.; Carswell, J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 A.D. 768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lafredo-v-baltic-american-line-inc-nyappdiv-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack