LaFrance v. St Martin Truck Stop & Casino

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION

BURNELL LAFRANCE CASE NO. 6:22-CV-01314 VERSUS JUDGE ROBERT R. SUMMERHAYS ST. MARTIN TRUCK STOP & CASINO MAGISTRATE JUDGE WHITEHURST

ORDER Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Whitehurst’s Report and Recommendation recommending dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. After an independent review of the record, and after consideration of objections filed, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. The Court additionally finds that to the extent Plaintiff is attempting to assert a claim of discrimination premised upon federal question jurisdiction, he has failed to show he has exhausted his administrative remedies and received a statutory notice of right to sue.! Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, consistent with the report and recommendation, Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. go Signed at Lafayette, Louisiana, this day of August, 2023.

ROBERT R. SUMMERHAYS ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

' See e.g. Taylor v. Books A Million, Inc., 296 F.3d 376, 378-79 (5th Cir. 2002) (“Employment discrimination plaintiffs must exhaust administrative remedies before pursuing claims in federal court. Exhaustion occurs when the plaintiff files a timely charge with the EEOC and receives a statutory notice of right to sue.”); Dao v. Auchan Hypermarket, 96 F.3d 787, 789 (5th Cir. 1996) (the filing of an EEOC charge is a precondition to filing suit in district court).