Lafradez v. Andrews
This text of 159 F. App'x 784 (Lafradez v. Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Petitioner Bailón Pascua LaFradez appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate the district court’s decision.
After an earlier remand from this court, the district court granted Petitioner’s habeas corpus petition and gave him 342 days of credit toward his federal sentence. In this proceeding, Petitioner contends that the district court’s second calculation [785]*785also was incorrect and that he is entitled to additional credit.
We agree with Petitioner in one respect only. The district court found that Petitioner’s federal detention ended on February 21, 1991, but the writ ad prosequendum formally kept him in federal custody until February 27, 1991. Therefore, the district court plainly erred. United States v. Jordan, 256 F.3d 922, 926 (9th Cir.2001) (describing the plain error standard). Accordingly, Petitioner is entitled to an additional six days of credit.
We have carefully considered Petitioner’s other claims, and the record, and are not persuaded that the district court erred in any other respect.
REMANDED with instructions to grant Petitioner six additional days of credit toward his federal sentence; otherwise AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
159 F. App'x 784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lafradez-v-andrews-ca9-2005.