Laforet v. Weber

23 La. Ann. 253
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMarch 15, 1871
DocketNo. 3144
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 La. Ann. 253 (Laforet v. Weber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laforet v. Weber, 23 La. Ann. 253 (La. 1871).

Opinion

Ludeling, C. J.

This action was brought to make the sheriff, Edward Weber, and his sureties liable for not having returned the fieri facias within the delay required by law.

The failure of the sheriff to return the writ within the time fixed by law is prima facie proof of his liability for the debt, but in this case the sheriff alleged, and offered evidence to establish, a legal excuse— that he aeted under the advice and direction of the' attorney of the party in whose favor the writ was issued. The sheriff and the attorney alone have testified in this ease. The former states positively that the attorney authorized and instructed him to retain the writ in his hands, while the attorney denies it as positively.

The question to be decided being one of fact, the opinion of the judge a quo, before whom the witnesses testified, is entitled to great weight. 6 La. 31; 13 La. 412; 3 An. 163 ; 21 An. 115, 139, 169,.782.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the district court be affirmed, with costs of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gouner v. Brosnan
98 So. 681 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 La. Ann. 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laforet-v-weber-la-1871.